We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.


Duty Of Care

Categories: Regulations

When you pick up after your dog. Wait...that's "care of doody."

"Duty of care" is a legal concept that helps to determine when negligence happens. It's basically a golden rule-type deal, though slightly altered. Instead of "doing unto others as you would have them do unto you," the concept takes as its centerpiece what a "reasonable" person would do.

Under tort law, each person has to act with a certain amount of attention and care for others. Specifically, they have to give a "reasonable" amount of care. Exactly what that means in any particular situation would ultimately get decided by a judge or a jury (depending on the case).

Related or Semi-related Video

Finance: What does it mean to have fiduc...51 Views

00:00

Finance a la Shmoop! What does it mean to have fiduciary obligation? Alright well

00:09

fiduciary refers to the responsible person, who has oversight, above a given

00:15

financial transaction, or process. That is, it is the fiduciary obligation, of the

00:21

head of a corporation's Audit Committee, to be certain that the

00:25

accounting process is handled fairly, objectively, inclusively and thoroughly [boss overseeing worker]

00:29

and there are a few other ly's in there, but well you get the gist. Doesn't it

00:34

seem strange, that some companies just seem to get into the same kind of

00:39

trouble again and again. Remember the BP oil spill, well it wasn't the first time

00:45

they'd had, an accident. You know, if you can call that spill only an accident.

00:49

What kind of oversight did they have? Any? Well some companies just have a [man carrying oil barrel

00:54

corporate culture that's run by the notion, that well, whatever isn't caught

00:58

as a crime, is legal. Lots of Wall Street stock brokerages came and went this

01:03

way. Yah, remember the Wolf of Wall Street? Kind of like that. Well what is

01:06

the obligation of a responsible party when faced with ethical dilemmas? Where

01:11

does the obligation start and stop? Should fiduciaries be held to a higher

01:15

personal standard than normal people? Yah, kind of the, you know, Harvey

01:20

Weinstein effect there. Yes, No, maybe, alright. Right, all three times. [question ABCD chart]

01:24

It's definitely yes, no, or maybe.

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)