Acquisition Premium

  

Lumber company A has had a devil of a time negotiating with the Lumberjack Union, but it buys company B so that they can go from five million acres to eight million acres of forest to kill, digest, and turn into scratchpads.

With a highly unionized labor force, both lumberjack companies had only 10% margins, and few resources to invest in technology. Combined, however, with their enormous new scale, it makes financial sense to replace two-thirds of their lumberjacks with robots, a.k.a., the Tree Slayers.

The would-be acquired lumberjack company B knows the math, because they've taken a couple of awesome finance courses on Shmoop, and while as a stand-alone company they might be worth 14x earnings, as they key to unlock the Tree Slayer and a new era of high-margin tree cutting, lumberjack company B will be smart enough to demand a big acquisition premium.

That is, instead of their steady state 14x earnings valuation, they'll ask for and probably get something closer to 20x earnings or more, as the acquisition premium here is warranted in the creation of this new behemoth tree cutting company, which everyone is happy about.

Except the trees. And the squirrels who lived in them. And the birds. And the atmosphere...

Related or Semi-related Video

Finance: What is Control Value?15 Views

00:00

Finance allah shmoop what is control value dance on a

00:07

fifty shades thing Well there's a partnership a semi evil

00:10

one there was once a tv siri's It was exorbitantly

00:14

expensive to produce but everyone wanted to make it So

00:18

it ended up being made not by one studio but

00:22

by three viacom paramount disney and then news corp fox

00:27

Before it was disney news corp fox well each of

00:29

the three partners put in a third of the money

00:31

and split all the money distributions equally The problem on

00:35

the show ended up being hugely successful when it ran

00:38

for the first time on network tv so that was

00:41

great but now it's in reruns and because all three

00:43

competitors generally hate each other he's financially if their job

00:47

too none are willing to run the show a lot

00:50

on their cable network or broadcast network because then they

00:53

generate revenues for their hated competitors so they don't run

00:57

the tv series even though people want to see it

00:59

And this is a big fat bummer to the actors

01:01

writers and producers of the show who were banking on

01:05

rerun royalties to pay for their divorces if one of

01:08

the studios owned the siri's I'ii controlled it let's call

01:12

that siri's sunlight ing well then the siri's would heir

01:16

a ton more and presumably generate a ton more desperately

01:20

needed revenues What do you think divorce lawyers work for

01:23

free Well the control value of owning that asset then

01:27

is huge because if it were owned by one player

01:31

well then that player could run it again and again

01:33

and again and again on their network like think big

01:36

bang on tbs and then monetize that asset and massively

01:40

so there's Incremental control value with the well controlling a

01:45

property And yet it's not to be confused with remote

01:48

control value which is about a buck twenty five on 00:01:51.209 --> [endTime] ebay

Up Next

Finance: What are accretive v dilutive v neutral acquisitions?
18 Views

Accretive: the acquisition has a net positive impact on earnings per share. Dilutive: earnings per share are negatively impacted as a result of the...

Finance: What's the difference between mergers and acquisitions?
23 Views

In a merger, the boards and shareholders of both companies must both vote in favor of the action, and the post merger acquiring company will often...

Finance: What does it mean to "roll up"?
1 Views

What does it mean to "roll up"? Roll Up refers to when a larger entity gobbles up its smaller competitors via acquisition. A good example is JP Mor...

Finance: What is the Williams Act?
5 Views

The Williams Act is federal legislation enacted to make acquisitions and/or takeovers fair. Nothing to do with tennis...sorry about that, tennis fans.

Find other enlightening terms in Shmoop Finance Genius Bar(f)